Answering Bill Fortenberry, Part III. Chris discusses the charge
of "intellectual dishonesty" and shows how Mr. Fortenberry himself seems to be
guilty of his own accusation. He appears to have covered up the heresies of key
Revolutionary figures by presenting quotes out of their full context. One quote,
in particular, exposes both Fortenberry and David Barton for their deceptions
concerning the Unitarian faith of John Adams, which they have attempted to cover
up. As we have shown before, Adams denied the divinity of Christ and did not
believe in the Holy Ghost -- something further confirmed in the research. Yet,
incredibly, Mr. Fortenberry gives the impression that faith in the Father, Son and
Holy Ghost is a "Calvinistic" doctrine, rather than a true tenet of the Christian faith.
Can this be what he meant to say? Or did he simply overlook important evidence?